Implementation of Supply Chain Management Essay

Supply kitchen stove of mountains all oversight is an oversight of processes when pitiful goods from the stage of customer order to the raw material stage and it includes the preparation, drudgery and distribution of products to the customer. Every organization has supply chain of different levels, depending upon their coat and type of product they are manufacturing. Their aim is to provide the customer with exuberant knowledge necessary to give the value that they demand and to gain the information regarding the customer too. The ultimate goal for any supply chain management is to reduce its inventory.For a successful supply chain, software systems are provided with clear interfaces to provide the customer with enough information they demand. Hershey nutrients Corporation and NIKE inc. are two very renowned organizations, wiz known for its food products and the other(a) for gymnastic footwear, equipment and accessories for sports and fitness activities. Both of these o rganizations adopted supply chain management systems in order to lower down their inventories and to increase their profit. But both of them failed in achieving their objective which was to reduce the inventories.The main mistake make by Hershey Food Corporation was, that they hired a supply chain system cost $112 million from SAP AG, Manugistics, and Siebel systems. The supply chain system was supposed to effectuate in data of everything from production to delivery. But getting software from leash different providers created unpredicted delays and complex problems in implementation. Also, another mistake do by the organization was that they utilize the whole system at at once instead of in stages. So therefore they faced problems in placing the orders and therefore executing them to warehouse for fulfillment.The problem faced by NIKE, inc. was a modus operandi to a greater extent complex, as said by 12 technologies marketing caput Katrina Roche NIKE problems were not tied t o the software but to the way the software was installed. (Sridharan, Caines, & Patterson, 2005) notwithstanding he says that his company accepts the responsibility for not being more militant in telling them that they needed to follow our implementation methodology. (Sridharan, Caines, & Patterson, 2005) 12 technologies valued to track each and every little product of NIKE which made the trouble more complex and therefore it took their time more than they had expected.The NIKE people made the same mistake as Hershey foods, that they implemented the system before they were mend to execute it. (Sridharan, Caines, & Patterson, 2005) So overall at initial stage supply chain systems were a bad experience for Hershey Foods and NIKE, Inc. There are current things which if the company would have followed then hopefully the things must have been the other way round. First of all only one supply chain system provider must be hired for the software, as more than one supply chain syste ms for same job results in failure. consequently providers implementation methodology is very important for node to follow in supply chain systems especially when they are modified to suit clients requirement. More over supply chain systems are very complex as they have to track over numbers of product varieties so therefore it must be implemented in stages rather than executing it at once. And if the company is switching from one system to another then first the system should be well-tried in order to check whether it is fulfilling the companys requirements or not. ?