College Athletes Should Be Paid Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Athl

College athletics is a billion dollar bill industry and has been for a ache time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure for postulate continue to rise. Its simple bigger, faster, stronger athletic supporters get out afford more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only reasonably to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the universitys revenue, habit sales, and lack of spending money. I believe that college sports should be considered a profession. Athletes merit to be paid for their work. College athletics are a critical severalise of Americas culture and economy. At the present time, disciple-athletes are considered novices. College is a stepping-stone to the professional leagues. The NCAA is exploiting the student- athlete. Big-time inculcates are running a national entertainment moving in that controls the compensation rate of the players like a monopoly (Byers 1). According to the NCAA regulations an athlete will lose his/her eligibility if they are paid to play sign a bid with an agent receive a salary, incentive payment, award, gratuity educational expenses or allowances or play on a professional team. The word amateur in sports has stood for positive values compared to professional, which has had just the opposite. The professional sport has meant large(p) and degrading while the amateur sport has meant good and elevating. William Geoghegan, Flyer tidings sports editor writes, Would paying athletes tarnish the ideal of amateurism? Maybe, but being fair is far more important than upholding an ideal (Geoghehan 1).Some people theorise that college athletes get paid by having a science, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they envisage moderate the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. Its all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes dont have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesnt want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ... ...hletes recruited to refer college come from lower, working-class families. The opportunity to enter the draft early to befriend their families financially is one that will hardly be passed by.On the fuck of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or each week check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they gravel into their sport and academics are worthy fair to middling. I have had a venture to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you menta lly and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will likewise help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught evaluate something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my impression yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have acquire floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.